I've been reading "Mere Christianity" by C.S. Lewis this week. I will record some of my thoughts on what I'm reading.
I have believed Lewis to be a genius ever since I read "The Chronicles of Narnia" about 4 years ago. (Yes, I loved before the movies came out). He brings such imagination and depth that I felt rejuvenated by reading that fictional work. "Mere Christianity" has been sitting on my shelf for a few years now. It is more like an essay, so it doesn't have the same "sit-with-a-cup-of-hot-chocolate-and-wander-into-another-world" feel. However, I've been impressed by his down to earth way of describing the invisible realm.
This book is actually a collection of the different talks that Lewis was asked to share over the radio during WWII. At that time, probably because of the increased awareness of the inevitability of death, people were curious, "What do Christians believe?" So, Lewis described it as best as he could. It is intriguing to see the influence that widespread war was having on media.
So, the first part is simply called, "Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe".
Lewis discusses how the simple fact that humans are aware of a "greater good" brings into question, "Where did this Moral Law come from?" (Historically it used to be called "Law of Nature".)
When the Moral Law is referred to, it is not a "law" in the traditional sense. It is much different than the Law of Gravity, because that Law can be seen consistently and scientifically. If an outside source was to study us, as we study animals or insects with no communication or inside scoop, that studier would not be able to report on this Moral Law. It really is not the FACTS of what humans DO, but rather what we feel we OUGHT to do. The Moral Law is an invisible one inside of us.
If one tried to deny this law, simply accuse someone of breaking it and the excuses will begin to pour out. As a general rule we all have an understanding that we should not break promises or take things that don't belong to us, among other things, though none of us follow these standards perfectly. When we break our standard, internal excuses begin.
Lewis mentions that this Moral Law is generally the same in all countries and ages. Some examples are given:
- you may be allowed only 1 wife or the rule may be 3 or 4 wives somewhere else, but we all know that you can't go around taking any woman that you want.
- there is a general understanding that kindness is admired. Whether you owe it only to your family or to the whole world is where the difference lies, but all agree that to some extent selflessness is admirable.
He brings up the issue, "What is the difference between the Moral Law and herd instincts that have developed within us?" I believe that by saying "herd instincts" he means the internal rules that we have grown to follow so that we can all be adaptable and survive!
- Common instincts are the drive for food, for self-preservation, for sex, or to be maternal. The difference is that the Moral Law is stronger than any one of our instincts and actually helps us to govern which instinct is correct at that moment. No instinct is right all of the time, nor can they be trusted 100%. It sometimes (often) will even direct us to do something CONTRARY to what our instincts are telling us to do. (Help someone though it puts ourself in danger, not go take the food though we are hungry, not to go make love to any girl you want to - funny for me to write that one, but he refers to this instinct bluntly, so I will too!)
The analogy is given that herd instincts are the keys on a piano, but the Moral Law is like a sheet of music that tells us which ones to play at a given time.
At one point he respectfully reminds us that though science is valuable and necessary, it simply does not have the authority to answer the question "Is there something more than what we see?" The question is not scientific because the answer cannot be found by observing or by measuring data. The one extra help that we have to answer this question is what we sense inside of us. We do not only OBSERVE men, we ARE men.
Where did this Moral Law come from? If we all are aware that there is a way that we SHOULD do things, but are not able to maintain it, why do we all know it and care about it? Why do we all make such a fuss if we are "wronged" and make such excuses as to why we didn't have to follow the rules in this one particular situation? Here Lewis declares that all he has brought us to at this point is that there must be a "Somebody", a "Greater Power." (He thinks that this greater power is most like a mind, so he refers to it as "Somebody") So, if this Somebody has put a Moral Law around us, in us, and we do not follow it, then we are guilty of breaking his rules. What does that mean for us?
I will include two quotes, and then I'm done for today.
pg. 29
"We have two bits of evidence about the Somebody. One is the universe that He has made. If we used that as our only clue, then I think we would have to conclude that He was a great artist (for the universe is a very beautiful place) but also that He is quite merciless and no friend to man (for the universe is a very dangerous and terrifying place). The other bit of evidence is that Moral Law which He has put in our minds. And this is a better bit of evidence than the other, because it is inside information. You find out more about God from the Moral Law than from the universe in general just as you find out more about a man by listening to his conversation than by looking at a house he has built."
pg. 31
"Christianity simply does not make sense until you have faced the sort of facts that I have been describing. Christianity tells people to repent and promises forgiveness. It therefore has nothing (as far as I know) to say to people who do not know they have done anything to repent of and who do not feel that they need any forgiveness. It is after you have realized that there is a real Moral Law and a Power behind the law, and that you have broken that law and put yourself wrong with that Power - it is after all this, and not a moment sooner, that Christianity begins to talk."